[Privoxy-users] What are ProxHTTPSProxyMII's features?

privoxy at arcor.de privoxy at arcor.de
Tue Aug 9 08:45:24 UTC 2016


User @Faxopita

since i cannot register to https://www.prxbx.com/forums/ due to 

###################################
Content Encoding Error

The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.

The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.

    Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.

##################################

or maybe they don't like users from other countries than america, i have to ask you via this mailing-list.

>From various post at https://www.prxbx.com/forums/ i see that you have developed some sort of https interface for privoxy and you're highly praised for this performance by some board users. 

>From your various post at https://www.prxbx.com/forums/ i can not find a single information - or maybe i overlooked it - what can be done with  ProxHTTPSProxyMII. 

You wrote this https://sourceforge.net/p/ijbswa/mailman/message/35070785/ and i quote from your post:

>You may want to filter HTTPS requests as well… I know there have
>been pains and cries recently about Privoxy not being able to filter
>those requests. There is currently one working solution
>though—ProxHTTPSProxyMII
><https://www.prxbx.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=2191&pid=18728#pid18728>–that
>I use on a daily basis with virtually no hiccup at all. It works
>great and I confirm Privoxy is now able to block very nasty
>encrypted requests. 

That says nothing to me.

We (I !!) know more or less what can be done with Privoxy on the http side. Https traffic can only be blocked by domain names. Privoxy can't see the paths, nor the headers etc.. This kind of a simple domain blocking can also be done with uMask, dnsmasq or a hosts file. What can be done else or more with ProxHTTPSProxyMII?

Regards.


More information about the Privoxy-users mailing list