[Privoxy-users] WebSocket in Privoxy

Fabian Keil fk at fabiankeil.de
Thu Mar 23 09:11:27 CET 2023


Fabian Keil <fk at fabiankeil.de> wrote on 2023-03-23 at 09:00:52:

> Marek Küthe <m-k-mailling-list at mk16.de> wrote on 2023-03-21 at 12:48:19:
> 
> > Why should Firefox use `CONNECT`? Isn't the WebSocket handshake
> > performed with a `GET`?
> 
> You're right, unencrypted WebSocket requests don't need to
> use CONNECT requests when using a proxy (but can).

Actually I was right the first time:

| WebSocket protocol client implementations try to detect whether
| the user agent is configured to use a proxy when connecting to
| destination host and port, and if it is, uses HTTP CONNECT method
| to set up a persistent tunnel. 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebSocket>

Fabian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.privoxy.org/pipermail/privoxy-users/attachments/20230323/65d65afa/attachment.bin>


More information about the Privoxy-users mailing list