[Privoxy-users] Concern about Privoxy sponsor

[Fabian Keil]

Ian Silvester <iansilvester at fastmail.fm> wrote:

> We're aware that this sponsor might not be seen in the best light by
> some, though I think Comparitech's characterisation is a tad harsh. It's
> not surprising I suppose, given that they've an anti-Privoxy agenda in
> promoting their own services. Regardless, I honestly don't think that
> the Privoxy userbase is interested in clicking sponsor links, making the
> point moot. 

Agreed.

For the record, I got two additional private mails from people
who were contacted by Comparitech with the same text.

> It's also instructive that they've not gone to the effort of identifying
> whether what they're promoting could actually replace Privoxy for the
> use case your article describes - clearly it could not!

Indeed.

Fabian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.privoxy.org/pipermail/privoxy-users/attachments/20180209/9ceb27da/attachment.bin>