[Privoxy-devel] macOS package changes (was: Privoxy 4.1.0 has been tagged)

Ian Silvester iansilvester at fastmail.fm
Tue Jan 13 13:16:44 CET 2026


Well-spotted Fabian! 

Yes both versions are from me. In working through the build on Sunday I noticed that there was a far more recent pcre2 available than installed on my (now rather aged) build machine, and in my focus on upgrading that entirely forgot to download and build zstd! I realised overnight so corrected that yesterday and made appropriate tweaks to the macOS build script to include it. 

I'm afraid though that I don't have local branches representing the prior 4.1.0 nor 4.0.0 states - the package is fairly quiescent these days so I work on the head I'm afraid.

Ian


On Tue, 13 Jan 2026, at 05:57, Fabian Keil via Privoxy-devel wrote:
> Fabian Keil via Privoxy-devel <privoxy-devel at lists.privoxy.org> wrote 
> on 2026-01-04 at 18:52:28:
>
>> Fabian Keil via Privoxy-devel <privoxy-devel at lists.privoxy.org> wrote on 2026-01-03 at 14:28:29:
>> 
>> > BTW, I intend to tag Privoxy 4.1.0 tomorrow, slightly behind schedule.
>> 
>> Privoxy 4.1.0 has been tagged and I have uploaded
>> the source tarball to SF and the website.
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> I noticed yesterday that a macOS package was available
> at SourceForge and copied the files over to the website
> and onion site mirrors.
>
> However, I forgot to regenerate the RSS feed and when I
> did that today I realised that the package file had been
> changed in place. Unfortunately the SourceForge feed [0]
> doesn't seem to mention this change.
>
> Both files have valid signatures from the same RSA key
> (54021FA8034C73730BF0EB74ADE1B21709E73DAF) and I'm optimistically
> assuming that's yours.
>
> I ran the files through diffoscope and came to the conclusion
> that a major difference is that the more recent package has
> zstd support. Is that correct?
>
> I pulled master from the OSXPackageBuilder and got a new
> commit [1] that also mentions zstd support. The previous
> commit [2] is from 2023, though.
>
> Do you have a local branch that matches the OSXPackageBuilder
> state used for the 4.0.0 macOS package and the previous 4.1.0
> macOS package? If yes, please push those changes as well.
>
> By the way, I also noticed that pushes to the OSXPackageBuilder
> didn't result in mails to the privoxy-commits@ list [3].
> That should be fixed now.
>
> Fabian
>
> [0]: <https://sourceforge.net/p/ijbswa/activity/feed>
> [1]: 
> <https://www.privoxy.org/gitweb/?p=OSXPackageBuilder.git;a=commitdiff;h=52278533f7b4699fda7d8b4dabd89af0464dda5f>
> [2]: 
> <https://www.privoxy.org/gitweb/?p=OSXPackageBuilder.git;a=commitdiff;h=07805356ffa905e8331895a668040120173d0d44>
> [3]: <https://lists.privoxy.org/mailman/listinfo/privoxy-commits>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Privoxy-devel mailing list
> Privoxy-devel at lists.privoxy.org
> https://lists.privoxy.org/mailman/listinfo/privoxy-devel


More information about the Privoxy-devel mailing list