[Privoxy-devel] how costly is --enable-strptime-sanity-checks ?

[Lee]

On 5/8/16, Fabian Keil <fk at fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> Lee <ler762 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/8/16, Fabian Keil <fk at fabiankeil.de> wrote:
>> > Lee <ler762 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 5/8/16, Fabian Keil <fk at fabiankeil.de> wrote:
>
>> >> > FEATURE_64_BIT_TIME_T is available in CVS now.
>> >>
>> >> I'll give it a try.  Expected difference in behavior now is what?
>> >
>> > As of regression-tests.action,v 1.60, level 17 tests should be
>> > skipped if FEATURE_64_BIT_TIME_T is unavailable.
>>
>> What about this one?
>>
>> 2016-05-08 09:44:42: Ooops. Got: 'REMOVAL' while expecting: SOME CHANGE
>> 2016-05-08 09:44:42: Failure for test 641. Header 'If-Modified-Since:
>> Wed, 31 Dec 1969 23:59:59 GMT' and tag 'hide-if-modified-since{+60}'
>> 2016-05-08 09:45:06: Executed 822 regression tests. Skipped 83. 821
>> successes, 1 failures.
>
> As far as Privoxy-Regression-Test was concerned, it did not depend
> on FEATURE_64_BIT_TIME_T. I just added the dependency in CVS.
>
> Thanks for the report.

And it's zero failures now :)

$ ./run_regression_test
Sun May  8 10:23:47 EDT 2016
2016-05-08 10:23:47: Asking Privoxy for the number of action files available ...
2016-05-08 10:23:47: Gathering regression tests from 9 action file(s)
delivered by Privoxy 3.0.25.
2016-05-08 10:23:48: Executing regression tests ...
2016-05-08 10:25:17: Executed 821 regression tests. Skipped 84. 821
successes, 0 failures.
Sun May  8 10:25:17 EDT 2016


Thanks
Lee