[Privoxy-devel] how costly is --enable-strptime-sanity-checks ?
Fabian Keil
fk at fabiankeil.de
Sun May 8 12:50:23 UTC 2016
Lee <ler762 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/8/16, Fabian Keil <fk at fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> > Lee <ler762 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/6/16, Fabian Keil <fk at fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> >> > Fabian Keil <fk at fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Lee <ler762 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > So why isn't there a 'year 2038' problem with gcc -mno-cygwin?
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe there is a problem and the sanity checks just don't
> >> >> detect it.
> >> >
> >> > Additionally most of the problematic time-related tests are
> >> > level 17 tests and should thus be skipped on native windows
> >> > builds due to:
> >> >
> >> > # Level 17 needs = feature status FEATURE_PTHREAD Yes
> >> >
> >> > Of course FEATURE_PTHREAD does not actually guarantee a 64
> >> > bit time_t, so maybe we should add a FEATURE_64_BIT_TIME_T
> >> > to make the test results easier to compare.
> >>
> >> That sounds good. It looks like the standard way to check the size is
> >> AC_CHECK_SIZEOF(time_t)
> >> which, on my machine, adds
> >>
> >> /* The size of `time_t', as computed by sizeof. */
> >> #define SIZEOF_TIME_T 4
> >>
> >> to config.h
> >> dunno how to get from there to FEATURE_64_BIT_TIME_T tho :(
> >
> > FEATURE_64_BIT_TIME_T is available in CVS now.
>
> I'll give it a try. Expected difference in behavior now is what?
As of regression-tests.action,v 1.60, level 17 tests should be
skipped if FEATURE_64_BIT_TIME_T is unavailable.
Fabian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.privoxy.org/pipermail/privoxy-devel/attachments/20160508/e9dbb53e/attachment.bin>
More information about the Privoxy-devel
mailing list