[Privoxy-devel] Sponsoring policy

[Fabian Keil]

Ian Silvester <iansilvester at fastmail.fm> wrote:

> I have strong opinions about this, but the  OpenSUSE policy is 404 (even
> that on their site!). If we're cosidering using that as a model, I'd
> like tovknow more about what we will offer for the different levels of
> sponsorship. Could you elaborate Fabian? 

Here's a screen grab of the OpenSUSE policy:
https://www.fabiankeil.de/tmp/Sponsoring_for_opensuse.png

What we will offer is up for discussion.

OpenSUSE's sponsor levels affect logo and link placement which
makes sense to me as it is probably the main thing potential
sponsors are interested in.

> Separately, I think we should consider whether sponsorship funds might
> be directed to paying foe development in order to shrink the TODO list.
> But I am getting ahead of myself. 

I thought about this as well (and would like it), but currently
I think sustainably funding the infrastructure has a higher priority.

So far my impression is that the potential sponsors that contacted
me don't particularly care how the money is spent as long as they
get their link and logo placement.

Fabian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.privoxy.org/pipermail/privoxy-devel/attachments/20160717/3608d0d1/attachment.bin>